Gold Open Access

The Effectiveness of Implementation Family Planning Village Program at Village Beting of Bugis Dalam Subdistrict East Pontianak District in Pontianak City And Village Sepadu Semparuk District Sambas Regency

Rianawati Rianawati(1Mail), Aida Mokhtar(2), M. Lutfi(3), GMS. Primastuti(4),
(1) IAIN Pontianak, Indonesia
(2) National Family Planning Coordinating Agency of West Kalimantan (BKKBN), Indonesia
(3) National Family Planning Coordinating Agency of West Kalimantan (BKKBN), Indonesia
(4) National Family Planning Coordinating Agency of West Kalimantan (BKKBN), Indonesia

Mail Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study is motivated by the high rate of Total Fertility Rate (TFR) in West Kalimantan, which is at 3.1 children per woman. In addition, information was also found that unwanted and unplanning pregnancies were still high at 9.1 percent, unmet need in 2016 was still 15.8 percent, and the development in family planning participation in the recent decade was still very slow. Generally, this study aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the KB Village. The study conducted in this study is an evaluative study with data collection carried out through quantitative and qualitative approaches. The qualitative approach aims to obtain in-depth information about input, process, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and reporting as well as achievement indicators of success. Meanwhile, the quantitative approach was carried out using a structured questionnaire to obtain knowledge, attitudes and community participation related to activities contained in the KB Village Program. The results obtained in this study are the number of active MKJP participants increased from 18 people initially to 28 people. In the aspect of unmet need before the declaration, 22.94% decreased to 19.49% 8) Community knowledge and participation related to activities and programs in the KB Village Beting Village all the people received information about the KB Village from the PPKBD / Sub PPKBD cadres, namely as many as 34 people (68%). Whereas in Sepadu Village, information about the KB Village was obtained from 7 people (14.29%) from PPKBD / Sub PPKBD cadres, the rest was obtained from community leaders of 14 people (28.59%), other sources were 10 people (20, 41%), from PLKB/PKB as many as 5 people (10.20%), PKK as many as 2 people (4.08%) and from nurses/midwives as many as 1 person (2.04%). There is no public participation outside the management in Beting, while in Sepadu there are 62 people.


Keywords


Implementation; Program; Village Family Planning

   

Article DOI



DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijase.v2i3.161
       

Article Metrics

 Abstract views : 198 
 PDF views : 106 


   

Article Pages


Pages: 136-144

   

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cohen, J., & Uphoff, N. T. (1977). Rural Development Participation: Concept and Measures for Project Design-Implementation and Evaluation. New York: Cornell University Press.

Dawam, M., & Fadila, W. (2016). Penelitian Operasional Pengembangan Model Pengelolaan kampong KB “Integrasi Program Kependudukan Keluarga Berencana dan Pembangunan Keluarga (KKBPK) di Village KB. Jakarta: Puslitbang Kependudukan BKKBN.

Djalal, F., & Supriadi, D. (2001). Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Adicita.

Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.

Dye, T. R. (2002). Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2002

Hasanuddin, et all. (2000). Suatu Tinjauan Sejarah Sosial Ekonomi. Pontianak: Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.

Hermawati, I., dkk. (2006). Pengkajian Keswadayaan Desa dalam Pendayagunaan Sumber Kesejahteraan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Balai Besar Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesejahteraan Sosial.

Moeljarto, T. (1987). Politik Pembangunan: Sebuah Analisis, Konsep, Arah dan Strategi. Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana.

Nugroho, R. (2009). Public Policy. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Nurdin, F. (1990). Pengantar Studi Kesejahteraan Sosial. Bandung: PT Angkasa.

Prihatin, E. (2011). Teori Administarasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabet.

Purwanto, E. A., dkkk. (2012). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik, Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Rambe, A. (2004). Alokasi Pengeluaran Rumah Tangga dan Tingkat Kesejahteraan (Kasus di Kecamatan Medan, Kota Sumatera Utara) Tesis. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB.

Rosady, R. (2000). Kiat Dan Strategi Kampanye Publik Relation. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada).

SK Bupati Sambas No. 576/DP3AP2KB/2017 Tentang Pembentukkan Kelompok Kerja Daerah/Distric Working Group Kependudukan, Keluarga Berencana Dan Pembangunan Keluarga. Pemda Kabupaten Sambas.

Sudarhan, D., et. al. (2005). MenejemenPendidikan. Bandung: Alfabet.

Sudjarwo& Basrowi. (2009). Manajemen Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sumaryadi, I. N. (2010). Sosiologi Pemerintahan. Dari Perspektif Pelayanan, Pemberdayaan, Interaksi dan Sistem Kepemimpinan Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Widodo, J. (2001). Good Governance: Telaah dari Dimensi Akuntabilitas dan Kontrol Birokrasi pada Era Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah. Surabaya: Insan Cendikia.

Winarno, B. (2012). Kebijakan Publik: Teori, Proses dan Studi Kasus. Yogyakarta: CAPS.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Rianawati - Rianawati

International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics (IJASE) | E-ISSN: 2685-2691